THE LEONARD LETTER
A weekly electronic newsletter from
Bill Leonard, Member
State Board of Equalization
October 20, 2003
"The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who
reads nothing but newspapers." Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
UNDER THE DOME
***Viva La Difference...***
Over the last couple weeks, I have spoken with at least a dozen reporters
about the Governor-elect, but it was not until late last week that a
reporter from the Stockton Record asked the most relevant question: For
legislators, how big a difference does it make to have a Governor from the
same party? My answer is that it is bigger than the difference between
night and day. Here is one example: When I was first elected to the
Assembly, Jerry Brown was Governor. When he released his Budget, I had to
read the newspaper like everyone else to learn what was in it. A few years
later when I was Assembly Republican fiscal lead and Deukmejian was
Governor, I participated in the discussions to write the Governor's
Budget.
Moreover, with both Deukmejian and Wilson, there was a tacit understanding
that legislation needed significant Republican support or would almost
certainly suffer the fate of being vetoed. Although in the minority, we
Republicans could often get the Democrats to significantly improve
legislation because of our confidence -- and their fear -- that our
Republican governors would back us up and deliver a veto if the other side
did not negotiate in good faith.
Lastly, I believe very strongly that had there been a Republican Governor
these last five years, despite the large Democrat majority in both houses,
not a single one of the myriad of job-killing laws that are strangling our
economy would have been signed into law. With this new Governor, I am
confident that the voices of reason and moderation will no longer be cries
from the wilderness.
***...And Maybe Just In TIme***
Professor Richard Vetter of Ohio University was in California recently.
His research about the negative effects of tax increases on the economy is
legendary. He made the point that the out-migration of Californians is a
reliable indicator of bad times. People move out of the state because
they have hopes for a better life elsewhere. Vetter presented the
statistic that California lost more people during the last decade than
escaped East Germany in the decade before the Berlin Wall went up! Its
time for California leaders to wake up that their negative policies hurt.
IN THE BOARD ROOM
***Power Grab***
Constitutional governments are based on an intriguing proposition. The
idea is that the government leaders will limit themselves to actions
authorized by the Constitution. This means that if the government tries
to limit free speech and the Constitution protects free speech then the
Courts have the duty to tell the government , "No." This concept of
limited government is tested regularly. The Board of Equalization now is
engaged in this extra-constitutional behavior. The staff of the Board's
Legal Department has advised the Board that we have the power to assess
property taxes on non-utility or merchant power generators. The problem
is that we do not have any such power. My colleague Carol Migden
recognized this last year when, while serving as an Assemblymember, she
authored legislation requiring the Board to tax these property owners. If
the Board already had such power, her law would not have been needed. Yet
the Board legal staff has ignored her new law (probably because it is also
being challenged as unconstitutional) in favor of claims that the Board
has the inherent authority to tell county assessors not to assess certain
property. They believe the Board of Equalization can do it better than the
counties would. This is an insult to elected county assessors, and it is
a governmental power grab (no pun intended) by the BOE sanctioned by legal
gymnastics.
***OAL's Blown Call***
BOE legal staff is not the only batch of government bureaucrats making
really bad calls these days.
This summer the Board approved new property tax rules that will allow
domestic partners to an exemption from reassessment upon the death of one
or the other partner. This is a benefit that was previously enjoyed only
by married Californians under the Constitution. I am in favor of giving
greater tax relief to all Californians, regardless of what kind of
relationship they are in, but I was first elected to the Legislature in
1978 as a supporter and defender of Proposition 13, from which the spousal
exemption originates. I maintain that the Board of Equalization does not
have the power to ignore the Constitution of California.
After the Board approved the new rule over my objection, the rule was sent
to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) for confirmation. I asked them
to deny approval of the regulation and submitted legal arguments including
an opinion of the Legislative Counsel showing that there was no authority
for the regulation. Last Wednesday, I received the stunning news that OAL
approved the rule. As far as I can tell, their only reason is that AB
205, the domestic partner bill recently signed by the Governor, in their
eyes has greater authority than the state Constitution.
The Office of Administrative Law has disgraced itself by this ruling and
there is no provision for reconsideration. Therefore, I am going to ask
the Governor-elect to find attorneys who take the Constitution seriously
to head up this agency and I will work with pro-family groups to protect
the Constitution.
***The Ninth Commandment***
My primary role as a member of the Board of Equalization is to make sure
that taxpayers are treated right by the tax bureaucrats who are trying to
separate them from their hard-earned money. As such, I make every effort
to see the taxpayers' point of view and give them the benefit of the doubt
in presenting their case. Most of the time that pays off, but in two
recent situations, the taxpayers have let me down.
First was a person who believed he had been wrongly denied his homeowner'
s/renter's assistance claim. Now, such appeals tend to be routine items at
most Board of Equalization Meetings, and the usual outcome is support of
the staff recommendation. In fact, to hear an appeal on the merits I have
to request that an item be set aside for a hearing at a future meeting. In
this particular case, I was so compelled by an appellant's tale of
disability and incapacity that I requested the case be pulled for future
review. Board of Equalization and Franchise Tax Board staff had
recommended denial of the claim, but based on what I read, I believed that
further review and perhaps a little more information from the appellant
would justify granting the requested assistance. However, the additional
review exposed that the appellant's tale of hardship and disability was
pure fabrication. Subsequent investigation revealed that not only had the
appellant committed perjury but also that the case was part of an
organized ring that was systematically filing false claims for government
assistance. The Los Angeles County District Attorney's office now is
considering filing charges against 18 people who filed false tax
assistance claims.
In another case, an appellant, in an attempt to obtain a majority of the
Board's support, misrepresented one Board member's position to another
Board member---apparently believing there would no communication that
would make this apparent. The result was a loss of the appellant's
credibility.
I sit on the Board as a friend to the taxpayer, but I am disappointed with
those who refuse to approach their tax dealings honestly or with
integrity.
MISCELLANY
***Three More Words to Know***
Each week, the Leonard Letter features a few of the words from a list of
100 words that some educators say every high school student should know.
The full list may be viewed at
http://www.houghtonmifflinbooks.com/booksellers/press_release/100words/.
58. Nonsectarian (adj) Not limited to or associated with a particular
religious denomination: Arnold Schwarzennger's transition team is
politically nonsectarian, pulling from the left, right and center of
California politics.
59. Notarize (tr. v.) To certify or attest to (the validity of a signature
on a document, for example) as a notary public: The Secretary of State has
until November 15 to notarize the recall vote and make it official.
60. Obsequious (adj) Full of or exhibiting servile compliance; fawning:
Governor-elect Schwarzenegger has an advantage over other newly elected
officials in that he is familiar with many people's obsequious behavior
around famous, powerful people and, therefore, less likely to succumb to
it.
BOE AND LEGISLATIVE DATES
November 15 --- Statement of the Vote --- The last day for the Secretary
of State to prepare, certify, and file a statement of the Vote.
November 18 & 19 --- BoE meets in Sacramento.
December 4 --- BoE meets in Sacramento.
January 5, 2004 --- Legislature reconvenes.
NOTABLE DATES/ HISTORY
October 20, 1803 --- U.S. Senate ratifies the Louisiana Purchase
October 20, 1818 --- 49th parallel established as the border between U.S.
& Canada
October 21, 1879 --- Thomas Edison perfects the carbonized cotton filament
light bulb
October 22, 1938 --- First Xerox copy made
October 23, 1861 --- First transcontinental telegram sent ending the Pony
Express
October 23, 1940 --- 40-hour work week goes into effect (Fair Labor
Standards of 1938)
October 24, 1764 --- John Adams marries Abigail Smith (marriage lasts 54
years)
October 24, 1983 --- U.S. invades Grenada
October 25, 1774 --- 1st Continental Congress adjourns in Philadelphia
GENERAL TAX INFORMATION
For answers to your general tax questions, call the Board of
Equalization information center. Customer service representatives
are available to help you from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Pacific
time, Monday through Friday (except state holidays).
Toll-free number: 800-400-7115
TDD service for the hearing impaired
TDD phones: 800-735-2929
Voice phones: 800-735-2922
HOW TO CONTACT ME
Bill Leonard
Board of Equalization
450 N Street, MIC: 78
Suite 2337
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 445-2181
Fax: (916) 327-4003
Email to:
Bill.Leonard@boe.ca.gov
|